I came across a youtube the other day that made me laugh. I think we all need to laugh more. Life is too short. This video is a short comedy act by Nina Conti, a ventriloquist. As part of her act, a man is brought onto the stage and is transformed into a human puppet. The comedic ventriloquist has complete control of what he says and operates his “mouth mask” to open and close his mouth to look like he is speaking. It is clever and I thought it was pretty funny.
Here is the link to the embedded video:
The video prompted me to make a simple observation.
A “puppet” can be defined as a person, group, government, etc., whose actions are prompted and controlled by another or others. The "puppet" is usually a charismatic person and holds a position of power or authority over others. However, the one(s) controlling the puppet have all of the power. While the "puppet" appears to be the one saying or acting on their own, it is the person behind the curtain that is actually doing the talking. Those in control are usually called the "powers that be". The "powers that be" always have an agenda.
In powerful corporations, there is always a sole leader that speaks for the entire institution. They usually have staff members or committees who help write or edit their speeches. The corporate head is the mouthpiece for the company. There is a delicate balance to make sure that what is said by this spokesperson will not offend a large amount of people. Furthermore, if a change in direction is desired for the institution, a delicate balance needs to be maintained between keeping the original practices versus changing and “implementing” new policies which might too difficult for the members of the group to accept. To avoid making these mistakes, institutions use focus groups, surveys, and opinions polls to help assess what will be currently acceptable to the larger group.
These institutional leaders need those under them to support and sustain them in order to maintain power and control. However I think Albert Einstein said it really well:
One interesting scripture found in Jeremiah 23:30 (New Living Translation of the Bible) says, "Therefore," says the LORD, "I am against these prophets who steal messages from each other and claim they are from me.”
Recently there has been a lot excitement about the recent Church policy change to lower the missionary age for the Elders to age 18 and for the Sisters to age 19. A few weeks ago, a member of the Quorum of the 70's met with local ward mission leaders. The General Authority asked the ward mission leaders why they thought the age requirements had been lowered.
He then said that he and all the 70's had a conference with two members of the Quorum of the 12 and they posed the same question to the 70's. The apostle told the 70's that the missionary age was not lowered to "save" all of these youth -- although that's a nice thing. They said there was only one reason it was done. It's because the Lord said so, to hasten his work---- that's it.”
Some might have watched the special report that aired in between the General Conference sessions that reported on this decision to lower the missionary age.
Here are a few interesting quotes from the above link.
“The First Presidency and the Quorum of the Twelve, they say, have studied this idea for years. Eighteen year old men have been serving in 48 countries throughout the world for the last ten years, because of university entrance and military qualifications in those nations.”
"Many might not know this is not the first age change for serving missions. The age for missionary service for men used to be 20 years olds prior to 1960. Elder Jeffrey R Holland was one of the first missionaries called when the age was lowered to 19 years."
Around 13: 43 minute mark in the above video, there is an interview with Elder Jeffrey R Holland.
Elder Holland states: “I was in the first wave of 19 year olds when that change was made in 1960. President Monson, as this was all being discussed with him, and as he was giving leadership to it, we asked his opinion in this and in all other matters about the age change . . . and he said, 'I was a Mission President, I was presiding in Toronto when the 19 years old change came and we didn’t miss a beat'.”
I found it interesting that he states that the decision to lower the missionary age was discussed with President Monson and that they asked his opinion about lowering the age. Faithful members would likely say that they believe that this was divine revelation given to President Monson, as the Lord's prophet. And the reason why it was lowered was because the Lord said so.. in order to hasten His work.
Anyway. . . sorry to digress. I thought the video of the human puppet was pretty funny and wanted to post it in case it might make another person laugh and/or at least smile. If it didn't, smile or laugh anyway because it helps brighten these latter days that we live in.
Who are the true prophets today that you believe God is speaking through?
The conference address where the missionary age change was presented cited investigation, and initial trial runs in other countries where the missionary age requirement was lower. These trial runs were positive and those involved motivated the change in age requirement for all others. Quote from Pres Monson's address: "Their faithfulness, obedience, and maturity have caused us to desire the same option of earlier missionary service for all young men, regardless of the country from which they come." The conference address mentioned no revelation, in fact it cited investigation and trial runs.
Why is it revelation in hindsight, but not mentioned during the actual announcement?
Our Bible Dictionary defines a prophet as anyone who has a testimony of Jesus Christ by the Holy Ghost. Using that definition, hopefully there are more than just 15 on the earth.
I like this quote by Joseph Smith... “No man is a minister of Jesus Christ without being a prophet. No man can be a minister of Jesus Christ except he has a testimony of Jesus; and this is the spirit of prophecy. ” (Teachings, p. 160.)
We read in Numbers 11: 29: "would God that all the Lord’s people were prophets, and that the Lord would put his spirit upon them!"
The bible dictionary is not scripture, although most LDS treat it as such. Not saying you are saying that, just saying.
It was written by committee, which from my point of view means it is just the philosophies of men mingled with scripture. Thomas Monson was the head of that committee and we all know what a inspired prophet he is. Just go down to Deseret Book @ City Creek there are many books that will tell you how inspired he his.
Robert Matthews did most of the work
BTW, the embedded video link above doesn't work for me, so here's the direct link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I4BB1TZcO_o
Do the philosophies of men mingled with scripture differ from revelation? Which do we currently see displayed in church policy decisions?
How do we know what is revelation?
"By the power of the Holy Ghost, ye may know the truth of ALL things" (Moroni 10:5).
And how do you know if the power of Holy Ghost is letting you know the truth?
Who's Robert Matthews? And what work did he do?
You know it's the Holy Ghost and not the Adversary because things coming from the HG will not be contrary to the words of Christ. While the Adversary and false prophets will add or take away or teach differently from the words of Christ. The words of Christ are our foundation to tell all truth from error, whether from man or spirit or angel.
Most LDS don't seem to bother comparing their revelation, inspiration or warm fuzzies or the revelation and teachings of Church leaders, to the words of Christ, thus they are easily led astray.
Post a Comment